‹ back to GIS Glossary

Mercator projection

Definition

The Mercator projection is a specific cylindrical, conformal map projection developed by Gerardus Mercator in 1569, which represents lines of constant compass bearing (called rhumb lines or loxodromes) as straight, intersecting segments on the map, making it exceptionally useful for marine navigation as a mariner could plot and follow a constant compass course simply by drawing a straight line between two points; however, this navigational utility is achieved by mathematically stretching the globe's surface in an east-west direction and, more dramatically, in a north-south direction, which results in a severe and progressive distortion of areas�landmasses appear increasingly larger the farther they are from the equator, making high-latitude regions like Greenland and Antarctica appear disproportionately massive compared to their actual size, while equatorial regions remain relatively accurate in scale.

Application

The quintessential practical application of the Mercator projection is in marine and aeronautical navigation for plotting a course of constant compass bearing. A navigator can draw a straight line between an origin and destination on a Mercator chart�this line represents a rhumb line (loxodrome), which corresponds to a constant true compass direction. While this is not the shortest possible route (a great circle is), it is dramatically simpler to follow with traditional instruments, as it allows a vessel or aircraft to maintain a single, unchanging heading for the entire leg of a journey, making the Mercator projection the indispensable foundation for nautical charts and flight planning for centuries, despite its well-known areal distortions.

FAQ

Why is the Mercator projection so famous and widely used online?

Its fame stems from two primary advantages. First, it is conformal, meaning it preserves local shapes and angles, making coastlines and country outlines appear recognizable. More importantly, it makes navigation simple by representing lines of constant compass bearing (rhumb lines) as straight lines. Its widespread use in early web mapping (like Google Maps) cemented it as the default "look" of a world map for generations, despite its distortions.

What is the main criticism of the Mercator projection?

The primary and severe criticism is its gross distortion of area, especially at higher latitudes. It preserves shape by progressively stretching the map north-south as distance from the equator increases. This makes landmasses like Greenland appear roughly the same size as Africa, when in reality Africa's area is about 14 times larger. This distortion can perpetuate a misleading Eurocentric or Northern Hemisphere-centric view of the world's geography.

If it's so distorted, is it still used for navigation today?

For traditional chart plotting, yes, it remains fundamental. Paper nautical charts for coastal sailing are still often Mercator-based because a straight line on them equals a constant, steerable compass course. However, for long-range ocean or air navigation, modern GPS and flight management systems typically calculate the more fuel-efficient great-circle route (shortest path) and then translate it into a series of short rhumb lines for practical steering, often using the Mercator projection as a computational tool in the process.

When should I use a Mercator projection, and when should I avoid it?

USE IT FOR: Navigation charts, any mapping where preserving local angles/shapes is critical (like large-scale topographic or city maps), and for web mapping tiles at low zoom levels where its conformity prevents shape distortion when panning.

AVOID IT FOR: Any world map intended for comparing country sizes, representing statistical data thematically (use an equal-area projection like Mollweide), or for educational purposes where an accurate sense of relative area is important. It is a specialized tool, not a general-purpose world map.