‹ back to GIS Glossary

Spatial Decision Support Systems

Definition

Spatial Decision Support Systems (SDSS) are interactive, computer-based environments that help people make location-dependent choices. They combine GIS data stores, models, business rules, and visualization dashboards so that complex tradeoffs can be explored transparently. An SDSS typically includes a catalog of spatial layers, a library of analytical workflows (such as suitability scoring, risk overlays, network allocation, or hydrologic routing), and a front end that lets non-GIS users adjust assumptions, compare scenarios, and document rationale. Strong systems emphasize provenance: datasets have lineage and refresh cycles; model parameters are versioned; and each decision is reproducible later. Modern SDSS connect to real-time feeds (sensors, mobility, weather) and provide collaboration features—commenting, what-if branches, and shared bookmarks—so multidisciplinary teams can converge on a defensible plan.

Application

City governments use SDSS to balance growth with environmental protection, testing zoning changes or transit alignments against housing needs and flood risk. Emergency managers simulate evacuation strategies under different incident footprints, road closures, and hospital capacities. Conservation organizations evaluate alternative reserve designs that maximize habitat connectivity while respecting community livelihoods. Utilities plan capital programs by visualizing condition scores, service gaps, and equity metrics. Businesses use SDSS for portfolio planning—site selection, delivery territories, and marketing mix—so executives can see the consequences of spatial choices rather than relying on static slides.

FAQ

What design principles keep an SDSS trusted by stakeholders who do not share the same background?

Expose data sources and freshness, show uncertainty with ranges not single values, and make assumptions editable rather than hard-coded. Provide clear, plain-language tooltips and defaults, and include an audit trail that records who changed what so decisions are accountable. Finally, pair maps with small, interpretable charts that explain why a scenario scores high or low.

How do SDSS differ from a typical GIS dashboard?

Dashboards primarily monitor; SDSS are built for exploration and choice. An SDSS lets users pose alternatives, run models, compare outcomes, and export decision packages. It emphasizes scenario management, sensitivity analysis, and documentation of the chosen path.

When should an SDSS use optimization rather than simple multi-criteria ranking?

When resources, budgets, or regulations impose hard constraints that ranking cannot honor. Optimization (linear, integer, or multi-objective) finds combinations that satisfy constraints while maximizing benefits, revealing tradeoffs that a simple score might hide.

What are practical ways to incorporate community input into SDSS scenarios?

Design participatory layers—crowd-marked hazards, priority locations, or comfort ratings—and weight them alongside technical layers. Offer public web forms that write to quality-controlled datasets, and display how community inputs shift scenario outcomes to build legitimacy.